Pages

Monday, September 10, 2012

FOOL MONKEY TAROT ARGOT by Indigo Merovingian


click for larger version.


FOOL MONKEY TAROT ARGOT by Indigo Merovingian

Synchronystically, at the same moment my fellow and fellah rearch comrades were matching TAROTTE to Movie Posters, grand researcher and scientist of Ojai CA, Indigo Merovingian, created this series on the Monkey and the FOOL card of Tarot.

Cat Concert - David Teniers

Again the figure of the fool mon-key with the apocalyptic trumpet 
Cat beast cocert and the Owl/Molech/Satan figure directing the concert.
Same vesica piscis / 3 fish table




Apes celebrating in the ( alchemical ) kitchen by Ferdinand Van Kessel, as always the fool mon-key present.



Mon-key smoking(fire) and drinking with an owl by Ferdinand Van Kessel.




A tavern interior with monkeys smoking and drinking by Ferdinand Van Kessel. 
Different authors but same theme - the fool mon-key.

David Teniers prodigal son and the fool mon-key 
Wake up time !


 Waite gives the Fool the number 0, but in his book discusses the Fool between Judgment, no. 20, and The World, no. 21.



White Sun - may refer to the KETHER, the Crown. In the Golden Dawn system, the Fool corresponds to a path leading downward from KETHER. 

Mountains - probably refers to the long mystical journey through the stark mountains. This is one the ways that Waite describes the mystical journey in his other works. 

Laurel Wreath - an obvious symbol of Victory, but why does it appear on the Fool, at the beginning of his journey? The answer may be that Waite saw the Fool’s journey as circular, and the Fool is beginning again after completing a previous cycle. 

The 8-spoked wheel is a symbol of Spirit, thought of as a fifth element. So perhaps Waite thought of the Fool as the symbol of the spiritual journey. 

Flames - same as the flames on the Tree of Life on the Lovers card. 

The Hebrew letter Shin can be found in one of the wheels on the tunic. This is possibly a reference to the letter correspondence used by Eliphas Levi. Levi placed the Fool between Judgment and World and gave it the letter Shin. In the Golden Dawn system, the Fool is assigned to Aleph.

However, considerable caution is required before drawing any connections between the Hebrew alphabet and the Waite-Smith cards. A. Grinder points out that Waite stated in a number of places that he did not believe in any systematic correspondence. For example, “But wherever it (Fool) is placed in the series, the correspondence between Trumps Major and the Hebrew Alphabet is ipso facto destroyed” (Shadows of Life and Thought, 190-191), and “It may be well to add that I am not to be included among those who are satisfied that there is a valid correspondence between Hebrew letters and Tarot Trump symbols” (Intro to The Book of Formation, trans. by Knut Stenring, Ktav Publishing House, 13-14). 

The symbol on the Fool’s wallet is not clear. It may be a shell and represent the 'good luck' scallops that were carried on pilgrimages. It may be a bird and refer to the Golden Dawn attribution of the Fool to the element of air. Paul Foster Case (The Tarot, p 34) says that it is an eagle. If he is correct, the symbolism is appropriate because Waite says (The Book of Destiny, p 249) “To dream of an eagle in a high place ...is good for those who are starting on some great undertaking.” 

This card is assigned to the element Air in the Golden Dawn system. This may explain the hair and tunic blowing. 

The white rose may refer to Fool setting off on a Rosicrucian journey. Waite was quite fascinated by the Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross. He wrote two books on the subject and regarded the Golden Dawn as a latter day Rosicrucian society. The three founders of the Golden Dawn were members of the “Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia,” the inner order of the Golden Dawn was the “Rosae Rubeae et Aurae Crucis,” and Waite’s own revised Golden Dawn group was the Fellowship of the Rosy Cross. Roses appear on many of the cards (Fool, Magician, Empress, Strength, Death) and seemed to have represented a rich symbolic complex for Waite.

He presents extended discussions, with significant overlap, in “The Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross” p 85ff, “Real History of the Rosicrucians” p 11ff and an article in “New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry.” Elsewhere (“Lamps of Western Mysticism,” p 327), he refers to “the beginning of discernment ...which lies within the centre of the Rose of Dante.” He also makes the interesting comment in “The Occult Sciences” that the Rosicrucian symbol “has no connection with the sublime symbolism of the Oriental world: Egypt, Thebes, Eleusinia and the sanctuaries of antique initiation are innocent of its import. It is a development of the monogram of the monk, Martin Luther, which was a cross-crowned heart rising from the center of an open rose.” 

The Cliff in the foreground of the card may be another reference to Rosicrucianism. The mountain or cliff appears on the Fool, Emperor, Lovers(?), Strength (?), Hermit, Death, Temperance(?), Tower, Moon (?), and Judgment. So this forms an important symbolic element in the background of many of the cards.

In the Adeptus Minor Ritual, the mountain is referred to “This is the symbolic Mountain of God in the centre of the Universe, the sacred Rosicrucian Mountain of Initiation, the Mystic mountain of Abiegnus.” Jung (Aion, p 203) says “The Mountain means ascent, particularly the mystical, spiritual ascent to the heights, to the place of Revelation where the spirit is present.” The mystic, Richard of St. Victor, advises: “Ascend that Mountain and learn to know thyself.” In Lamps of Western Mysticism, (p 269) Waite says “...that process which I will call Ascending the Mountains of the Lord.”

In the "Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross," Waite goes through "The Chemical Wedding of Christian Rosencreutz" ~1616. On page 161, he says the main character is presented with a choice of roads - the first is the short and dangerous, rocky road (Implied in the Fool card?). 

A remarkable insight into Waite’s vision of the Fool symbolism is provided by Waite's poem, “At the End of Things,” published in The Collected Poems of Arthur Edward Waite. Access to the poem has been provided by the research of A. Grinder at his A. E. Waite website. Grinder is providing an invaluable service to the Tarot community by locating and posting the Miscellaneous Writings of A. E. Waite.

The poem says:
When I heard that all the world was questing,
I look'd for a palmer's staff.

"Palmer" is a Medieval term that refers to a pilgrim to the Holy Land.

I cast around for a scrip to hold
Such meagre needs...
An old worn wallet was that they gave me,
With twelve old signs on its seven old skins.

The 12 and 7 probably refer to the Zodiacal Signs and the traditional Planets. In other words, the pilgrim started off with the traditional Occult knowledge that Waite refers to as Transcendental Science. (See “The Threefold Division of Mysticism” from the periodical The Unknown World Volume one, number one; Aug. 15, 1894, accessible at http://www.adepti.com/.)

Waite points out that because of the lies and deceits of past occultists, many pilgrims were misled:

The fools fell down in the swamps and marshes;
The fools died hard on the crags and hills;
The lies which cheated, so long repeated,
Deceived...

But the present pilgrim is protected:

But me the scrip and the staff had strengthen'd...
The paths I've taken, of most forsaken,
Do surely lead to an open sea...

And the pilgrim reaches the mystical goal:

Which then was wisdom and which was folly?...
The fool, as I think, at the chasm's brink...
Did, even as I, in the end rejoice...

It has been suggested that W. B. Yeats assisted Waite and Smith in designing the cards. (See Magician footnote #2 for more detail.)

It is interesting therefore to look at the character of the Fool as it appears in Yeats's early plays. The following is from Graf, W. B. Yeats: Twentieth Century Magus (Weiser, 2000), quoting Yeats himself.

I had my Wise Man humble himself to the Fool and receive salvation as a reward... The Fool...wears a mask...which makes him seem less a human being than a principle of the mind.

Later, Graf herself notes These fools possess a wisdom so corrosive that it strips them of their ability to behave appropriately or to be members of the status quo...They appear to be mad, but Yeats, following Plato, suggests that theirs is a divine madness.

In one of his poems, Yeats says I would be - for no knowledge is worth a straw - ignorant and wanton as the dawn. 

The appearance of the Rose on the Fool card may also have been influenced by W. B. Yeats. Graf points out tht Yeats often used the symbol of the rose in his writings. She quotes from the Variorum Editions of the Poems (Allt and Alspach, eds., Macmillan, 1987) # 811:

He saw the garden of Eden...and...came to a tall, dark tree..and told to go up...near the top of tree a beautiful woman, like the Goddess of Life...gave him a rose. The reference is to the Shekinah of the QBLH Tree of Life, and the Fool is positioned at the top of the tree in the Golden Dawn system.
Based on original research by (in alphabetical order) A. Grinder and R. O'Neill. To add to this collection of information, please email Robert V. O'Neill.





Thursday, September 6, 2012

Movie Posters as Tarot

The Sun  #19


Ace of Swords



Wheel of Fortune # 10
Wheel of Fortune #10

The World / Universe #21




The Moon #18





(P.S. Moon - Female Goddess ABSENT from conventional version Tarot illustrations. Why?)
The Moon, Goddess Diana


The Emperor # 4



The Emperor #4




The Hermit #9

The Hermit # 9


Monday, September 3, 2012

Alex Jones Claymation / Engineering of Consent

Room 101's Alex Jones' Satire Claymation Videos


Alex Jones: False Opposition Psy - Op Psy - Op
!@#)@#$_%*#^%@#+_$%)@+$%

"Let’s make a thought experiment and you can test the validity of the experiment in the real life:
You are hungry and I wrote the word ‘apple’ or draw an apple picture on a piece of paper, or said the word apple (the signifier). People tend to/ are conditioned think that these signifiers, i.e., symbols, or dots, or sounds, signify a real, an actual apple (the signified). Although, at the beginning of our evolutionary history, when we were living in the state of nature and the language just began to be formed, one could show a physical apple on a tree (the signified) and call it with using one’s voice as an ‘apple’ (the signifier). But following the complete development of language and invention of writing, no longer have the signifiers signified anything, the ‘signified’; they are merely symbols and signifies nothing:"




"“…Such is the strange ‘being’ of the sign (a): half of it always ‘not there’ (b) and the other half always ‘not that.’ (c) The structure of the sign is determined by the trace or track of that other (d) which is forever absent (e)….” (1)
(a) The signifier plus the signified constitutes the ‘sign’.
(b) The signified, the actual apple is no longer present.
(c) The signifier, the word or picture of apple,
(d) The trace of the actual apple we saw in the jungle one hundred thousand years ago before the invention of language and writing.
(e) The signified, actual apple, does not exist in the structure of language, that is, one cannot eat them (the symbols) to appease one’s hunger."




"This is secret, of the method of propaganda and of the control, which had been used in governance of the people since the beginning of civilizations, and these methods have been perfected and further developed with the invention of mass media to create soulless organic machines:
"...We reject government authoritarianism or regimentation, but we are willing to take action suggested to us by the written or spoken word. The engineering of consent is the very essence of the democratic process, the freedom to persuade and suggest..."

(1) “Translator’s Preface” by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, in Jacques Derrida, “Of Grammatology”, Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, p. xxvii.
(2) Edward L. Bernays: “Engineering of Consent”, 'Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science' No. 250 (March 1947), p. 114, (Available online) http://www.scribd.com/doc/36956567/27666624-Engineering-of-Consent-Edward-Bernays27666624 Engineering of Consent Edward Bernays
www.scribd.com"




"“Primarily, however, the engineer of consent must create news. News is not an inanimate thing. It is the overt act that makes news, and news in turn shapes the attitudes and actions of people.... The developing of events and circumstances that are not routine is one of the basic functions of the engineer of consent. Events so planned can be projected over the communication systems to infinitely more people than those actually participating, and such events vividly dramatize ideas for those who do not witness the events.
“The imaginatively managed event can compete successfully with other events for attention. Newsworthy events, involving people, usually do not happen by accident. They are planned deliberately to accomplish a purpose, to influence our ideas and actions. "




"“Events may also be set up in chain reaction. By harnessing the energies of group leaders, the engineer of consent can stimulate them to set in motion activities of their own. They will organize additional, specialized, subsidary events, all of which will further dramatize the basic theme.” (1)
(1) Edward L. Bernays: “Engineering of Consent”, 'Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science' No. 250 (March 1947), pp. 113-120. (Available online) http://www.scribd.com/doc/36956567/27666624-Engineering-of-Consent-Edward-Bernays
27666624 Engineering of Consent Edward Bernays
www.scribd.com
Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.
"...We reject government authoritarianism or regimentation, but we are willing to take action suggested to us by the written or spoken word. The engineering of consent is the very essence of the democratic process, the freedom to persuade and suggest..." (2)
(2) Edward L. Bernays: “Engineering of Consent”, 'Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science' No. 250 (March 1947), p. 114."



Monday, August 13, 2012

Clockwork Orange, Batman?

A Clockwork Orange is a 1962 dystopian novella by Anthony Burgess. A satire portraying a future and dystopian Western society with—based on contemporary trends—a culture of extreme youth rebellion and violence: it explores the violent nature of humans, human free will to choose between good or evil, and the desolation of free will as a solution to evil. 


The book has three parts, each with seven chapters. Burgess has stated that the total of 21 chapters was an intentional nod to the age of 21 being recognised as a milestone in human maturation. The 21st chapter was omitted from the editions published in the United States prior to 1986. In the introduction to the updated American text (these newer editions include the missing 21st chapter), Burgess explains that when he first brought the book to an American publisher, he was told that U.S. audiences would never go for the final chapter, in which Alex sees the error of his ways, decides he has lost all energy for and thrill from violence and resolves to turn his life around (a slow-ripening but classic moment of metanoia—the moment at which one's protagonist realises that everything he thought he knew was wrong).
At the American publisher's insistence, Burgess allowed their editors to cut the redeeming final chapter from the U.S. version, so that the tale would end on a darker note, with Alex succumbing to his violent, reckless nature—an ending which the publisher insisted would be 'more realistic' and appealing to a U.S. audience. The film adaptation, directed by Stanley Kubrick, is based on the American edition of the book (which Burgess considered to be "badly flawed"). Kubrick called Chapter 21 "an extra chapter" and claimed that he had not read the original version until he had virtually finished the screenplay, and that he had never given serious consideration to using it. In Kubrick's opinion, the final chapter was unconvincing and inconsistent with the book.